Page 111 - Necmettin Erbakan University Press
P. 111

TAI’FAH OR NATION? A POLICITAL HISTORY

              SOCIAL          OF THE LEBANSE MARONITE COMMUNITY







                                                 Editor        :  Borja W. Gonzalez Fernandez
                                                 Page          :  638

                                                 Measurement :  16X24 cm
                                                 Year          :  2020
                                                 Category      :  Social
                                                 ISBN          :  978-605-70069-3-6
                                                 DOI           :  10.51144/neupress.2023.97












          Going beyond the scripturalistic and even archaeological penchant so ubiquitous in Oriental Christian Studies, this book’s
          focus on the present will try to dispel the dominant historiographical account that portrays the Maronite community as the
          hegemon in pre-war Lebanon to underline, on the contrary, how the community participated, on an equal footing with
          the other major Lebanese tawa’if, in the game of “corporate federalism”, in the consociational arrangement that
          characterized what Michel Chiha defined as the country of “associated confessional minorities”. In fact, it will be argued
          that the bitter internal rivalries plaguing Maronite leadership, in both clerical and lay circles, throughout our study period –
          and beyond, as witnessed by the only recently overcome conflict between General Caun and Samir Geagea – prevented
          the community from taking full advantage of the constitutional prerogatives formally attributed to its main representative in
          the political game, the President of the Republic. Forced to compromise, the Maronite community participated, as will be
          explained below, in the development of an unwritten constitutional tradition that, breaking away from the rigid legal
          positivism enshrined by Kelsen and his followers, consecrated a power-sharing decision-making system which, under the
          catchy name of National Pact, severely curtailed presidential authority and established a double-veto arrangement at the
          helm of the State.
                               Necmettın Erbakan Unıversıty Press
                                                                                                  pressneu
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116